Alright, let me tell you about my deep dive into spinal cord stimulator (SCS) psychological evaluations. It was quite the journey!

First, I got assigned the task. Basically, the boss walks in, says we need to start doing proper psych evals for SCS candidates, and then points at me. “You’re doing it,” he said. So, I started from scratch. Zero experience, just a vague idea of what was involved.
Then came the research phase. I spent days digging through articles, guidelines (mostly from pain management societies), and anything I could find on best practices. Honestly, it felt like drinking from a firehose. I was trying to figure out what tests to use, what areas to cover, and how to write a report that would actually be helpful to the surgeons and pain management doctors. I was looking for stuff about pain catastrophizing, mood disorders, personality factors – the whole shebang.
Next up: test selection. This was tricky. There are a ton of psychological tests out there, but not all of them are relevant to SCS evaluations. I ended up settling on a combination of things. I knew I needed something to assess depression and anxiety, so I went with the trusty Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). I also included the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) because, well, pain catastrophizing is a big deal. I threw in the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) to get a better understanding of the patient’s pain experience. Finally, I decided to include the Millon Behavioral Medicine Diagnostic (MBMD) to assess relevant personality characteristics and coping styles impacting their pain condition. I wanted a good picture of their psychological state.
Time to build the interview. After the tests were selected, I needed a good clinical interview. This part was fun because it felt like detective work. I wanted to know about their pain history, how it impacted their daily life, their coping mechanisms, their social support (or lack thereof), and any history of mental health issues. I created a structured interview guide to make sure I covered all the important areas. It was important to find out what their expectations were for the SCS, too. Were they hoping for a miracle cure, or were they more realistic?

First patient came in…gulp! Okay, this was the real test. I was nervous! I followed my interview guide, administered the tests, and tried to be as empathetic and understanding as possible. It took way longer than I expected – almost three hours! By the end, I was exhausted, but I felt like I had a good understanding of the patient’s situation.
Report writing…ugh. This was the hardest part. Taking all that information and turning it into a concise, useful report was a challenge. I spent hours poring over the test results, interview notes, and trying to synthesize it all into something meaningful. I made sure to address their psychological suitability for the SCS, potential risks and benefits, and any recommendations for pre- or post-operative psychological support.
Feedback is key! After sending out a few reports, I started getting feedback from the surgeons and pain management doctors. Some of it was helpful, some of it not so much. But I took it all in and used it to refine my process. I learned to be more specific in my recommendations, to highlight potential red flags, and to tailor my reports to the specific needs of each patient.
Rinse and repeat. It’s been a process of continuous learning and improvement. Every patient is different, and I’m constantly learning new things about pain, psychology, and the challenges of living with chronic pain. I’m still tweaking my approach, refining my interview, and looking for ways to make the process more efficient and effective. It’s not perfect, but it’s gotten better over time.

- Key Takeaway 1: Don’t be afraid to start from scratch. Research, research, research!
- Key Takeaway 2: Choose your tests carefully and make sure they’re relevant to the population you’re working with.
- Key Takeaway 3: The clinical interview is crucial. Listen actively and be empathetic.
- Key Takeaway 4: Report writing takes time and effort. Be clear, concise, and specific in your recommendations.
- Key Takeaway 5: Feedback is your friend! Use it to improve your practice.
So, yeah, that’s my experience with SCS psychological evaluations in a nutshell. It’s been a challenging but rewarding journey. Hopefully, this gives you a bit of insight if you’re ever in a similar situation!